Buy Tobacco Leaf Online | Whole Leaf Tobacco

Potassium Content in Tobacco and Combustion

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
Hi everyone,

The importance of potassium in tobacco is something I’ve been researching on and off for a few years. Not only is K important for overall plant health, but it’s also essential to good combustion. This last point is something I’ve been struggling with ever since growing my own. I could grow beautiful plants here in AZ that cured well, and smelled amazing. However, they were basically fireproof. I could take a cured dried leaf, heat it with a direct flame and the oils would flash off. As soon as the flame was removed the tobacco would instantly go out, no ash, just charred tissue.

Initially I thought this was due to bad curing and fermenting. So I built a temperature and humidity controlled chamber, and kilned all the tobacco that came out if it. Still, no improvements in combustion!!

At this point, I began researching more. I had found that chloride (as mentioned here before) can be detrimental to combustion. However, my soil test showed my garden is very low in chloride. Further reading into old American publications made reference to excessive sulfate as being an issue in some cases. That clicked because I had added a boat load of elemental sulfur to my garden to correct the pH. However, something I couldn’t really reconcile was the idea that sulfate alone was the issue. For starters, many fertilizers are sold as their sulfate salt. Second, plants in general will limit the amount of sulfate they absorb. Certain species, like brassicas and onions absorb more, but for the most part many plants are vacuuming up all the S in the soil.

So I went back to researching. This has been difficult because the USA hasn’t really published any good science or nutrition studies on cigar tobacco in a quite a long time. There are some from China, but it’s still few and far in between. I stumbled upon an article from the 1960s (I think), where the authors were trying to elucidate the effect of the different alkali metals on the combustion of cigar tobacco. Essentially, they took tobacco leaves, hydrated them, and nebulized the leaves with various salts and looked at how they burned to try and find some sort of correlation.

I’m have trouble finding the article, but luckily I took a screen shot:
F7D12A8D-95B0-41F6-9C57-139A2B656BB5.png
The gist of the article was that misting tobacco leaves with a 2% solution of potassium carbonate accelerated burning quite a bit. They also tested other salts like Cesium and rubidium carbonate, but that’s not something you would want to smoke.

When I read this article I had to try it. I made a 2% solution of food grade potassium carbonate in RO water and misted down a few leaves of my wonderful smelling fire proof little Dutch from a few years ago. I put it in a bag to hydrate and reach equilibrium. Upon opening it, my nose was hit with ammonia. Which is something I hardly ever saw when curing my home grown.

The treated tobacco took much longer to dry, and it stayed in the “medium case” zone a lot longer than my regular tobacco. This makes sense since a lot of potassium salts are hygroscopic and hold onto moisture pretty tenaciously. Once the leaf was in low case I grabbed a piece and burned it. As soon as the flame was taken away I had a orange ember and a few wisps of smoke! It went out about 5 seconds later but I was ecstatic! Never ever has my homegrown burned remotely as well as that little piece of treated leaf.

So I misted up the bag of tobacco, which is a mix of little Dutch and corojo. I also rolled a small cigar which is currently drying. Smoke report to come soon.

I’m not advocating treating tobacco with chemicals, but potassium carbonate is very benign. In fact potassium bicarbonate is used as “organic” spray to control powdery mildew and other funguses on tobacco and many food crops. This had me speculating that farmers spraying for mildew may inadvertently be improving the combustion of their tobacco.

This also led me to another thought. Remember the stories passed around about Bethune (or however you spell it)? For those of you who don’t know, apparently it’s a secret sauce used by some farmers speculatively composed of herbs, spices, alcohols etc. For the farmers that do use it, the recipes are guarded more than kernel sanders chicken spices. One curious thing I have noted is that many of the supposed recipes include tobacco stalks. This is very interesting to me because the stalks accumulate large amounts of potassium relative to the leaves. So, I doubt the herbs and alcohol do anything, but leaching the K out of the stocks probably helps the treated leaves combust. Most of the stories around Bethune come from Cuba. While Cuba has some very nice soils in certain areas, a lot of the soils there are weathered and in high precipitation areas. This tends to leach solubles like K out of the soil. And unless properly supplemented, there are going to be deficiencies. So Bethune may have been born out of necessity before proper tobacco fertilization was developed. On the contrary, areas like Esteli in Nicaragua have much younger soils and are consequently much higher in K, so no Bethune needed.

Overall the takeaway from this is K is very important for combustion, typically I’ve seen 2.5% dry weight as the min for good burning tobacco. If a dry plant produces ~ 6oz of plant material, well that’s a lot of potassium per acre! If your fertilizing well or already have good soil fertility, it’s probably not an issue. But if you have fire proof tobacco like me, and are too stubborn to call it a loss, spritzing the leaf with food grade potassium carbonate may be an option.

I’m sure the farmers know the importance of proper K nutrition, but I thought I would share this for everyone. It took me a while to connect the dots, and I hope it’s helpful for someone who grows nomex tobacco like me.
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,757
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
A word of caution. Potassium carbonate solution is strongly alkaline, so wear eye protection if you work with it. The intense ammonia generated is similar to adding alkali to a smokeless tobacco prep.

The cited article is from a 1917 issue of the Botanical Gazette:

The 16 page article alone can be downloaded in pdf form:

Bob
 

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
A word of caution. Potassium carbonate solution is strongly alkaline, so wear eye protection if you work with it. The intense ammonia generated is similar to adding alkali to a smokeless tobacco prep.

The cited article is from a 1917 issue of the Botanical Gazette:

The 16 page article alone can be downloaded in pdf form:

Bob
Good point Bob, potassium bicarbonate is pretty alkaline. Not as bad as lye drain cleaner, but much more so than baking soda or household ammonia. If you get it on your skin, you can wash it off without any Ill effects. It’s will feel like soap, because it basically makes soap from the oil on our skin. Definitely not something you would want accidentally sprayed in your eyes either. Interesting thing about the ammonia. I had always heard ammonia removal during fermenting was a big indicator of how the tobacco was progressing. It makes sense too because ammonia bearing things tend not to burn well. With my home grown I basically never had ammonia evolution, except in a few odd cases. It makes sense that the K may help with ammonia evolution during fermentation since K salts are usually alkaline and non volatile, so by raising the pH the ammonia can volatilize off.

I currently have tobacco growing indoors in a tent with really good water and high K fertilization. I may try taking a few leaves after color curing and spraying them to ferment separately. I’m curious about the ammonia evolution aspect, and smoking quality of the finished leaf. However, with the good K fertilization I have going, it may not make a noticeable difference. Only one way to find out for sure.

I haven’t tried it yet, but you could probably use potassium bicarbonate as well. Bicarb is much less alkaline, but you’d need more of it per liter to make the same K concentration.

Thanks for finding that paper. It’s very interesting overall. It reminds me that a lot of science used to be practically oriented and empirical - not just run on the micro scale, “detected” with GC, and written with chat GPT.

Something curious noted in the paper was that Cs and Rb carbonates had even better combustion enhancement. This led me down a side tangent wondering what the combustion enhancement mechanism was. I found a newer paper that talked about “vaporizing” tobacco and though the following was very interesting.
2E972882-EA0F-4BF3-96DF-9C192F0675DD.png

That’s a pretty substantial reduction in igniting temp and activation energy. I don’t have a ton of evidence, but I think it comes down to the ionization energy of the metals in tobacco. Regular old O2 is a ground state triplet and unusually stable for such a reactive molecule. That’s why stuff just doesn’t combust spontaneously on earth. To get O2 to burn things it needs a kick, usually in the form of heat, or in this case a catalyst that lowers the activation energy. Potassium is relatively easy to ionize for a metal, and in the ionized state it can help kick off these reactions. As we can see below, potassium has the lowest ionization energy of the metals that tobacco likes. CS and Rn have even lower energies, which lines up with the improved combustion, but plants don’t absorb them too well and they are not common in ag soils.
.ABD32A14-1D2C-4A85-B29D-D78171AA0C93.jpeg
These reactions often times proceed through a radical chain of reactions. Interestingly, chloride and the other halogens are great at stopping these radical reactions.
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,757
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
One aspect to consider is that cured tobacco which retains more of its protein tends to char, rather than burn. The alkali isn't "releasing" intrinsic ammonia, but is yanking nitrogen moieties off of the amino-acids that make up albuminous proteins. Kilning and "aging" both allow the leaf's intrinsic oxidizing enzymes to do that as well.

Bob
 

ChinaVoodoo

Moderator
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
7,220
Points
113
Location
Edmonton, AB, CA
One aspect to consider is that cured tobacco which retains more of its protein tends to char, rather than burn. The alkali isn't "releasing" intrinsic ammonia, but is yanking nitrogen moieties off of the amino-acids that make up albuminous proteins. Kilning and "aging" both allow the leaf's intrinsic oxidizing enzymes to do that as well.

Bob
If that's the case, would sodium bicarbonate do the same thing?
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,757
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
Potassium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate yield significantly different pH in an aqueous (water) solution.

"Sodium bicarbonate appears as odorless white crystalline powder or lumps. Slightly alkaline (bitter) taste. pH (of freshly prepared 0.1 molar aqueous solution): 8.3 at 77 °F. pH (of saturated solution): 8-9."

"K₂CO₃ is a basic salt with pH values more than 11 even at 0.1 M."

Short answer: I don't know.

For perspective, the pH scale is exponential. So the difference between a pH of 9 and a pH of 11 is 100 times the concentration of hydroxyl ions.

Bob
 
Last edited:

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
I believe in the original paper the tested sodium carbonate as well. If I recall properly, the trend for increased combustion was
Na<K<Rb<Cs which lines right up with the ionization energies of each. Na is toxic to plants and Rob and Cs are crazy expensive. So that leaves K, which plants love and apparently helps combustion.

Bob, to add to what your saying about ammonia - depending on the pH during curing ammonia may exist as the protonated cation which would be non volatile. The extra K would grab that proton rendering the ammonia volatile. Qualitatively, this makes sense to me. If the pH is too low during fermentation, we probably aren’t going to smell any ammonia as the albumins are broken down. But if there is enough basic material like K, that would help liberate the NH3. That’s just speculation from me, but it makes sense. I have a nice pH meter, if I don’t succumb to laziness, I’ll try measuring the pH of the leaves by washing a leaf or two with distilled water at some sort of interval.

Also @ChinaVoodoo, I haven’t explicitly yet. I’ve seen numbers thrown around, like “at or above 2.5% K” for good tobacco. But I’m not sure how this correlates with fertilization rates. I’m guessing it depends a fair bit on the soil type and the cation exchange capacity of the various soils. On the other hand, pretty much every K salt is water soluble so it may not vary as much from soil to soil. For my indoor grow, I just kinda ball parked it. I figure I might get 6oz of total dry material per plant, and I’m using KNO3 for the K. I forget numbers what I settled on, but I think I was shooting for around 5g of K per plant with an extra 20% just in case.
 

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
So... All of those teachers were right. I might need to know some chemistry for something some day.

Bob
Chemistry is about the only subject I ever kinda understood, in every other subject I’m about as knowledgeable as your average Labrador is in math.

It’s besides the main point, but I believe the reason not many people like chemistry anymore is how it’s taught. I was lucky to have a teacher who would blow up balloons of hydrogen or set off thermite. That really caught my attention as a kid. Now days it seems like most “chemistry” demos are filling up balloons via baking soda and vinegar…

Reminds me of a quote I see years ago “chemistry is all that stinks and explodes. Physics is everything that never works”
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,757
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
Yes! There is potassium in your cell phone.


Perhaps you could bury one cell phone at the bottom of each grow bag.

Bob

EDIT: ...at the bottom of each grow bag—along with a tube of toothpaste.
 

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
A cell phone would improve combustion, while the stannous fluoride might enhance toothiness.

Bob
Bob, you may be on to something here. Imagine tobacco that burns well and supplies cavity fighting fluoride to our teeth. 9/10 dentists would be compelled to recommend it.

Edit: sensodyne and crushed up cell phones may not be the most effective source of K. For the non farmers out there, some stump removers are quite pure KNO3. A 1lb bottle is around $7 and provides 44%K and 11% N in the form of nitrate. That’s probably enough K for about 30-50 plants depending on the final size, plus it’s free from chloride and sulfate for people who have to worry about that.

Could I Neuralink a phone to my plant? I want to be able to call it and see if it’s doing okay.
 
Last edited:

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
@ChinaVoodoo
Here is an interesting ppt on k and n application vs final leaf content for cigar tobacco : https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/abstracts/2022_TWC23_Short.pdf

I’m guessing this was part of a lecture or seminar, it would be nice if that was available. Anyway, it looks like K fertilization correlates well with final K content in the leaves, especially in the fields that were lower in baseline K. The final K content was highest in the sandy loam soil, maybe the sandy soil releases the K easier than the soils higher in clay. Also looks like k side dressing 6 weeks after transplant had the most noticeable effect. Side note, but interesting: K in this test did not correlate with overall yield.
 

deluxestogie

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
25,757
Points
113
Location
near Blacksburg, VA
My humble impression is that the photos of K deficiency in the CORESTA study simply showed earlier ripening. Of course, wrapper should be harvested at the first sign of maturation. There is no evaluation reported on the quality of the finished leaf (aroma, combustion, tensile strength, etc.). I also noticed that the soil pH of the tested plots was just barely touching the bottom end of acceptable.

Bob
 

PressuredLeaf

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
432
Points
93
Location
Arizona
I was kinda wondering the same thing. Sure, if young leaves are yellowing at the edges too early it’s probably and issue. The leaves in the photos looked pretty mature to me.

I wish there was more to this, like a video recording or something. Often these ppts involve a lot of additional verbal information from the presenter and questions from the audience. I wish that was captured.
 
Top